Mymatejoechip blogs in several places. They are all linked through this portal, which is a porthole looking into the polluted ocean that is my mate Joe Chip. (That means you are this very moment sitting in the suite of an ocean liner. Congratulations, your wealth and social status must be far greater than mine. Doesn’t that make you feel better?) [Read on MacDuff, here.]
Unexpected Visitor
We don’t normally expect anything this large visiting backyards in Glossolalia (except Cthulhu perhaps, or a spider-woman). I would have included a shot of it on the top of my old garage, but that may have tricked you into believing that birds can fly, when we know that is not possible. There was a drought at the time, so lots of marsh birds were looking elsewhere for tucker, even in the desolate suburbs of outer Dis.
I continue to work on the next installment of Not Trevor, but the memories are too difficult to deal with. In our anxious world, do we have as many words for mental illness as the Eskimos have for snow? You betcha we do. Think about it though, if the DSM is couched in terms of a wine-taster’s palate, who are the connoisseurs who enjoy the tasting? A dark and hidden group? Thats why it is called Poetry and Paranoia.
This weeks truly terrible poetry is your mate’s tribute to 60s rock musicals, where he lambasts chickens for their failure at lactation and general lack of mammalian aspiration. Just because you can rhyme does not mean you should, kiddies. A trite contribution to Marxian theory with a short recitation of a visit to a bank is here, but you really wouldn’t bother clicking, except for the picture of communist superman.
Finally, in WWJCD?, one of nature’s terrible challenges. A young woman laments the medical condition known as “spontaneous penis”. Or is she suffering from the more disgusting, but easily treated, ingrown lizard? Read it and find out.
A big hello this week to gingerfightback, who is seriously odd, and is nice enough to comment on some of my stuff occasionally.
Your mate reads a lot of horror stories (though not as much as he used to). He is very used to being disappointed. Somewhere (can’t be bothered reaching to my shelf) Orwell comments upon the difficulty with short story collections, the effort of settling in and allowing the mental furniture to be arranged, only to have to dump the lot a few pages later. One lives with a novel a lot longer, and so the investment of settling in has a greater pay off. Perhaps its just laziness. I read a lot more novels than short story collections possibly for this reason, possibly for reasons of marketing and accessibility. I read genre fiction also out of laziness, but also because of marketing – I like these particular sorts of things, so there is a good chance I will like books marketed as these sorts of things. Yet reading horror and sf, what am I after? The idea, the gimmick, the surprise, the special thing. The difference between a genre novel and a genre short story is often just the space the idea is played out over. I appreciate good characterisation, impressive use of language and so on, your mate is not just reading for the “thing”. Often, to get a novel out of “the thing”, there is a predictable treatment, either the adventure novel or a thriller. That is fine, I read on trains, I read on buses, I read late at night when I get a moment. A thriller keeps the pages turning, but I have been there and done that so many times. Looking back at my recent reading, I received a lot of pleasure from “Thought Crimes” by Tim Richards, a short story collection, and look forward to the release of another soon. I very much enjoyed “2oth Century Ghosts” by Joe Hill (more than I enjoyed his novels, what was the point of ‘Horns’?), I was excited working my way through it. I look forward to the thrillers of Michael Marshall (I confess “The Straw Men” is on my shelf of favourite novels), but they often read as high tech or spy thriller approaches to horror themes, with the associated predictablility. Yet his “Substitutions” (writing as Michael Marshall Smith – I read it in the Mammoth Book of Best New Horror Vol 22) raised in me a frisson that I don’t get to experience very often as I grow older, until the end where “oh shit” turned to “Oh SHIT”, leaving me with a big smile.
So where is all this leading? There were quite a few lovely bits of horror in that collection, but of course with the range of writers represented, one is often bound to be disappointed, after all it is someone else’s selection. I found that with the previous volume. Who knows, I am no reviewer, I am not particularly articulate about these things, I just know what I like. Maybe it was my mood, maybe because I was reading on an e reader instead of a book. However, having said that, there was one story which knocked my socks off, ”Two Steps Along the Road” by Terry Dowling. Excellent. A premise which usually piques my interest only to leave me “meh” is that of a paranormal investigation group, from the government or a university. It is treated so well here, and the monster, who is not hidden at all, who walks amongst us and eats meals with us and talks with us about itself, is terrific. Nice and interesting, good story, enjoying it a lot, then, on a commuter train, in broad daylight with people all around, I realised that I was scared. Usually, the best I can hope for in horror fiction is that other spice, disquiet, and I am happy when I get it. However, I do not scare easily when reading. I can be fearful for a character I have invested in, but not scared like watching a horror movie scared. Sometimes when I cannot sleep images from reading may scare me or lead me to unpleasant places, but again, that is not scared while reading. I loved it. If you get a chance and if you like horror at all, I recommend it. I have bought his novel “Clowns at Midnight” on the strength of it, so we will see how that goes.
And I enjoyed this.
And your mate is still blushing from the maybe declaration of some kind of love in the comments under “The Crimson Pimpernel” below. You are too kind!!
Rat candy
Reblogged from You Are What You Eat:
Gentle Readers, today I cheat, but you will see why: “In 1849, hungry gold miners crossing the Nevada desert noticed some glistening balls of a candy-like substance on a cliff, licked or ate the balls, and discovered them to be sweet-tasting, but then they developed nausea. Eventually it was realized that the balls were hardened deposits made by small rodents, called packrats … Not being toilet trained, the rats urinate in their nests, and sugar and other substances crystallize from their urine as it …
The reference to “wise parents” is something that died, but referred back to a post that asserted that wise parents do not leave their babies lying around in pig pens for the pigs to eat. True, but ultimately trite, I’m afraid.
Sticky beak
My best photo of an azure kingfisher so far, I have a lot of work to do on these. They usually fly off before I can get my camera ready, so I’ll have to be a little bit happy with this.
Your mate has been busy and has a lot of work to do, so not much in the way of commentary today. He has solved all of the world’s food security problems here. I am a little surprised that he has gone all tabloid on us here and provided details of his own personal Cuban crisis ( a sultry night … a chance encounter … with JFK … you join the dots, but not on your screen, the ink may not come off). He provides well meant advice on delicate family relationships here, but one is left wondering whether he understands what understands means. He’s even managed to pen and publish a poem about adolescent longing and sunburn here. True art.
Your mate was in geek boy heaven this week watching Shark Harbour. What more could one ask for from a documentary – sharks, gadgets, sharks, cameras on sharks, satellite tracking devices on sharks, shark attacks, sharks? I got to watch people at work who are absolutely enthused about what they do. Your mate is passionate about very little (he is a plastic doll, after all, as evidenced by his gravatar), but he so likes to see enthusiasm in others. It was odd, I was sitting there watching it (it isn’t gruesome) and I realised that I was feeling happy. You have to realise that in my part of the world, reports of shark sightings and shark attacks are portents of Christmas, and I suspect there was a bit of childish enthusiasm bubbling up around that, together with some excitement about “safe fear” (that will not feel so safe next time I am at the beach). Every Christmas holidays, the newspapers would report dangers and crises – funnel web spider bite fatalities, shark attacks, “Deadly blue ringed octopus found in children’s pool”, stranger danger, and brewery strikes, so that now emergencies give me a Christmassy feel.
Not Trevor
I reject the path of Trevor, whether well trodden or not.
I am the King
You may like to click on a few links and see what else your mate has been up to this week. Your mate has felt very poetic, as well as very Erich von Danikenish. He has carried out a thorough scientific but also poetic analysis of ancient astronauts and relationships with fathers here. In a not unrelated vein, he has considered what car God drives and resolved all intra-religious bickering about the issue of evolution here. It is good to get these things settled and out of the way.
Speaking of things poetical, there is even a ditty about Leonard Cohen picking is nose.
If you did not catch last weeks “Not Trevor”, you may be interested, given the almost psychic way your mate predicted the announcement this week by an Australian scientist that a solution to environmental problems in Australia’s Northern Territory may be to release wild elephants.
Your mate has given advice to a fellow about the marriage his parents have arranged for him. Heartfelt. Touching. Emotional. Check it out here.
Interested in China and martial arts? WHY WOULDN’T I BE, MR CHIP? Exaccerly. This week’s shout out goes to Nathaniel, who can tell you how not to get hit.
This week: Watched Moon. Enjoyed it very much, even though they used a forbidden idea. Read “The Afrika Reich” by Guy Saville – the action keeps rolling, interesting but less plausible than Deighton’s SS-GB, but I get annoyed when I get to the last page and find there is a sequel coming, which is not really a sequel, but a continuation. Reading “The Watcher” by Charles MacLean – certainly horror, and getting weirder. Worth a read: “Things we didn’t see coming” by Steve Amsterdam.
Brown is the new black
Hello Your mate hopes that you are comfortable. What are you wearing? That’s interesting. This is the Joe Chip portal, with highlighted links to the various places Your mate rants during the week, only a left click away.
In an act of repentance for writing a mean poem about her, Your mate advised Ms Thatcher that he would not be going to see that new film about her (and that in any event, she was much nicer looking than that Meryl Streep), and she was very kind in her reply. However, Your mate did see the new fascist propaganda film “Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy”, and while he enjoyed parts of it, he does not understand why they were making Kim Philby out to be a bad guy. He was resourceful and a hard worker, what more can any employer expect? This follows on from Your mate’s cry from the heart in favour of internet censorship (which did not meet universal approval, and left several people wondering if they were really Kate Bush. NO THEY ARE NOT.)
There have been developments in Glossolalia, with Trevor taking action to ensure that the streets are more interesting (if not safer).
Following on from his discussion of wombats, Your mate has been considering the flavour of flags, in prose and poesy. Mmm, yum.
The womb-bat controversy continues, with much debate in paranormal circles (is a paranormal circle a couple of wriggly lines? Ahh, but if it is wriggly, is it a line?).
Please let the Great Lakes Socialist know that he has to knuckle down and study harder. To twist the words of Kenny Rogers, there will be plenty of time for revolting, once high school is done.
Reading: ”Surface Detail” by Iain M Banks – I used to be able to devour these things, but I keep wandering away from it – no doubt I’ll finish it though it seems like every Banks sf novel ends in suicide*; ”The War of Art” by Steven Pressfield (via Ron Dionne), so good on procrastination; “Toward God” by Michael Casey. Enjoyed: ”The Misogynist” by Piers Paul Read (thank you Peter Craven); “River of Gods” by Ian McDonald.
*On this, I gave up reading a lot of genre fiction ages ago because of the sameness – yes one reads a genre because it meets certain requirements, but one of the requirements I have is to be surprised, to be dazzled, to be impressed, to go, yes, that inspires me. One doesn’t expect that everyday, but you need it once in a good while. (Clockworm has posted on some aspects of sameness here.) Of course, literary fiction is also a genre, and so much of it is the same, or even if it isn’t, NOTHING BLOODY HAPPENS, or it is a reflection of those aspects of the modern world I don’t like. (You don’t ask for much, Joe Chip.) Goodness, I was even forced to read non-fiction. And now I keep flapping about between it all. Perhaps I am being dishonest – I’ve read too much indiscriminately over the years, and I want the old excitement without having to think too much. *sigh* Don’t worry Joe, you’ll cheer up when you win the lottery.
Mooning about
Your mate is nothing if not judgmental, quick to use national stereotypes to avoid thinking. For example, Germany = militarism; USA = conspiracy theories; North Korea = fun times; Russia = a desperate fight to return to democracy; Australia = interesting animals. And the most interesting of all animals are the cryptids, the subjects of cryptozoology. Australia has plenty of them – phantom panthers, bunyips, yowies, and most intriguing of them all, the womb-bats. I hope to provide photographs soon. In the meantime, you can click on a link and learn all about them here. Society has had to develop to accommodate these cute animals, and your mate has provided some advice regarding etiquette here. It is very important not to confuse them with the savage, woman biting wombat, so for your own safety and edification, you must read this now.
Speaking about things strange and fortean, your mate had a very interesting discussion here about UFOs with partialsceptic. Partial sceptic suggested most ufos can be explained by the weather. Your mate challenged him on that, forcefully putting the point that it is unlikely weather could build advanced craft to fly around space in.
Meanwhile, in preparation for the coming world revolution, your mate has provided a list of topics you are not allowed to think about here. It is very important that you read this, otherwise how will you know whether your thoughts are appropriate and you need to report for re-education?
Your mate hopes you have a very good week.
Big Boy
Found this fellow on my walk, probably a bit under a metre head to tail tip.
Nothing happening in Trevor land this week, however your mate ruminates about the nature of the universe and contact with ET here (if the editor will hit the right button and approve the post, come on Edgarberger you lazy bugger), and conducts a scientific analysis of homeopathy here. The bad poetry continues here. On a good poetry page, he has a chat about Dorothy Day.
More horrifying, your mate considers himself an agony aunt, and dares to give advice to anyone who will listen at WWJCD? (What Would Joe Chip Do?). I bet this one won’t last long. The first (and perhaps only) piece is inspired by Adrianna F, who lives here.







